Lexus RX 1997 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus RX engine produces 11 HP more power than Chevrolet Blazer, but torque is 57 NM less than Chevrolet Blazer. Thanks to more power Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 68 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.60 m | |
| Lexus RX is 3 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Blazer, 14 cm wider, while the height of Lexus RX is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1725 litres | 1920 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Lexus RX has 34 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. The Chevrolet Blazer may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Blazer (by 195 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
| |