Lexus RX 2005 vs Volvo XC60 2010
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.3 Hybrid | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Lexus RX) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Volvo XC60) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 288 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus RX engine produces 27 HP more power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 32 NM less than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 20.00 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
| Lexus RX is 13 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2130 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Lexus RX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`505 kg | 2`430 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`000 kg | 1`810 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 505 kg | 620 kg | |
| Lexus RX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Volvo XC60 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 7600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |