Lexus RX 2003 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Lexus RX engine produces 39 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Volvo XC90. Despite less power, Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 11.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus RX could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Lexus RX is smaller. Lexus RX is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 439 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2130 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 174 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 293 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Lexus RX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 9000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |