Lexus RX 2003 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 204 HP | 326 HP | |
Torque: | 283 NM | 500 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Lexus RX engine produces 122 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 217 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 15.4 | |
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Lexus RX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 78 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
760 km on highway | 620 km on highway | ||
Lexus RX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.74 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
Lexus RX is smaller. Lexus RX is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 978 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2130 litres | 1909 litres | |
Lexus RX has 539 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 221 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 2`750 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 6800 | 6200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |