Lexus RX 2003 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 NM | 307 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus RX engine produces 3 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 24 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 13.2 | |
|
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Lexus RX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Lexus RX is smaller. Lexus RX is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2130 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Lexus RX has 539 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 221 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |