Lexus RX 2003 vs Nissan Terrano 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 NM | 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus RX engine produces 50 HP more power than Nissan Terrano, but torque is 21 NM less than Nissan Terrano. Thanks to more power Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 9.1 | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus RX could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Terrano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Lexus RX is larger, but lower. Lexus RX is 1 cm longer than the Nissan Terrano, 8 cm wider, while the height of Lexus RX is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 115 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2130 litres | 1900 litres | |
|
Lexus RX has more luggage capacity. Lexus RX has 324 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Terrano. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 230 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |