Lexus RX 2003 vs Nissan Murano 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 248 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 NM | 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Murano is a more dynamic driving. Lexus RX engine produces 44 HP less power than Nissan Murano, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Nissan Murano. Due to the lower power, Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 12.3 | |
| Lexus RX consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that by driving the Lexus RX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Murano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Lexus RX is smaller. Lexus RX is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Murano, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 923 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2130 litres | 2005 litres | |
| Lexus RX has 484 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Murano. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 125 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 2`295 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Murano has
| |