Lexus RX 2003 vs Mercedes ML 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Lexus RX engine produces 68 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 67 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 12.0 | |
| Lexus RX consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus RX could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Lexus RX is smaller. Lexus RX is 4 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2130 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Lexus RX has 112 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Lexus RX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 2`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 5800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 9.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |