Lexus RX 2003 vs Lexus RX 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 NM | 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX 2009 is a more dynamic driving. Lexus RX 2003 engine produces 73 HP less power than Lexus RX 2009, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Lexus RX 2009. Due to the lower power, Lexus RX 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 10.6 | |
|
The Lexus RX 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX 2003 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX 2009, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus RX 2003 could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Lexus RX 2009 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Lexus RX 2003 and Lexus RX 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2130 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 2`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Lexus RX has
| |