Lexus RX 2003 vs Jeep Wrangler 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 199 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Lexus RX engine produces 5 HP more power than Jeep Wrangler, but torque is 32 NM less than Jeep Wrangler. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 13.8 | |
|
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that by driving the Lexus RX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 79 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Lexus RX is smaller. Lexus RX is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Wrangler, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2130 litres | 2322 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.25 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.85 metres less than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Lexus RX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 2`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
| |