Lexus RX 2003 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Lexus RX engine produces 14 HP less power than Jeep Commander, whereas torque is 227 NM less than Jeep Commander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 10.8 | |
|
The Jeep Commander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus RX could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Commander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Lexus RX is smaller. Lexus RX is 5 cm shorter than the Jeep Commander, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2130 litres | 1940 litres | |
|
Lexus RX has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Lexus RX has 227 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Commander. The Jeep Commander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 190 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Commander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |