Lexus RX 2003 vs BMW X5 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Lexus RX engine produces 27 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 17 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 13.0 | |
|
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that by driving the Lexus RX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X5 2003 3.0 engine: The BMW M54B30 is a 3.0-liter naturally aspirated inline-six producing about 231 hp, produced between 2000 and 2006. It is widely regarded as one of BMW’s more successful engines of that era, known for smooth operation and strong performance. With proper maintenance, these engines often ... More about BMW X5 2003 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Lexus RX is 7 cm longer than the BMW X5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2130 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Lexus RX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 580 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Lexus RX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`380 kg | 2`620 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`835 kg | 2`020 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 545 kg | 600 kg | |
| Lexus RX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than BMW X5. Therefore, BMW X5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 4400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 8.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
BMW X5 has
| |