Lexus RX 2009 vs Volvo XC60 2010
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.5 Hybrid | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Lexus RX) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Volvo XC60) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 317 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus RX engine produces 6 HP more power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 3 NM less than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 20.00 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Lexus RX is 14 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Lexus RX is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 446 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1570 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Lexus RX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`405 kg | 2`430 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`130 kg | 1`810 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 275 kg | 620 kg | |
| Lexus RX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is more than two times less than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Volvo XC60 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |