Lexus RX 2009 vs Volvo XC90 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 277 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 346 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Lexus RX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus RX engine produces 114 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 8.2 | |
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus RX could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.74 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
Lexus RX is smaller. Lexus RX is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 9 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 600 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Lexus RX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`545 | 2`680 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 12 800 | 12 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |