Lexus RX 2009 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 277 HP | 218 HP | |
Torque: | 346 NM | 510 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 9 seconds | |
Lexus RX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus RX engine produces 59 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 164 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.2 | |
Lexus RX consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus RX could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 78 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 21 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus RX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.74 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
Lexus RX is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm wider, while the height of Lexus RX is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 978 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`545 | 2`750 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 12 800 | 5600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |