Lexus RX 2012 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.5 Hybrid | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Lexus RX) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Volvo XC60) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 299 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 317 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Lexus RX engine produces 5 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 123 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 19.60 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2013: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Lexus RX is 13 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Lexus RX is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 496 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1570 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`615 kg | 2`440 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |