Lexus RX 2012 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 277 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 346 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Lexus RX engine produces 27 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 94 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.7 | |
| Lexus RX consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Lexus RX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 22 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus RX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Lexus RX is 13 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Lexus RX is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 446 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1570 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Lexus RX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 115 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`545 kg | 2`440 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`975 kg | 1`835 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 570 kg | 605 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |