Lexus RX 2012 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 277 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 346 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus RX engine produces 30 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 224 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 7.5 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus RX could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus RX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Lexus RX is smaller. Lexus RX is 6 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 446 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1570 litres | 1554 litres | |
| Lexus RX has 336 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 16 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`545 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 800 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |