Lexus RX 2012 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 277 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 346 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus RX engine produces 23 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, but torque is 31 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Despite less power, Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 2.17 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Lexus RX is smaller. Lexus RX is 2 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 29 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 446 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1570 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`545 | 3`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 800 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |