Lexus RX 2022 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Lexus RX) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 275 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
| Lexus RX engine produces 31 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 270 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.0 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus RX could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | 278 mm (10.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Lexus RX is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 838 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 220 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 838 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1308 litres | 1686 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Lexus RX has more luggage space (by 58 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 378 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Lexus RX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`479 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`885 kg | 2`178 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 594 kg | 1`022 kg | |
| Lexus RX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 72 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 67 800 | 47 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |