Lexus RX 2003 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 242 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Lexus RX engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 78 NM less than Volvo XC90. Despite less power, Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 11.5 | |
| Lexus RX consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Lexus RX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Lexus RX is smaller. Lexus RX is 8 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 490 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2130 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 123 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 293 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |