Lexus RX 2003 vs Lexus RX 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 242 NM | 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 8 seconds | |
| Lexus RX 2003 engine produces 47 HP less power than Lexus RX 2009, whereas torque is 104 NM less than Lexus RX 2009. Despite less power, Lexus RX 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 10.6 | |
| Lexus RX 2003 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX 2009, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus RX 2003 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Lexus RX 2003 is smaller. Lexus RX 2003 is 1 cm shorter than the Lexus RX 2009, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX 2003 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2130 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Lexus RX has
| |