Lexus RX 2003 vs Volvo XC60 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 328 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus RX engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 8 NM more than Volvo XC60. Despite less power, Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 70 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Lexus RX is 10 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2130 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`430 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 7600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |