Lexus RX 2019 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Lexus RX and Land Rover Range Rover Sport have the same engine power, but Lexus RX torque is 30 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.2 | |
| Lexus RX consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Lexus RX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 104 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus RX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus IS, Lexus GS, Toyota Tacoma | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Lexus RX is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
924 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Lexus RX has 327 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This could mean that the Lexus RX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Lexus RX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`656 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 53 000 | 65 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |