Lexus RX 2016 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 625 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 5.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Lexus RX engine produces 272 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 275 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 12.8 | |
|
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Lexus RX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 750 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Lexus RX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus IS, Lexus GS, Lexus NX | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Jaguar XJ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Lexus RX engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
| Lexus RX is 4 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 553 litres | 784 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Lexus RX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`500 kg | 3`050 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`995 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 505 kg | 740 kg | |
| Lexus RX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 47 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 600 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |