Lexus RX 2016 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Lexus RX) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Lexus RX engine produces 20 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 250 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.3 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus RX could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus IS, Lexus GS, Lexus NX | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
| Lexus RX is 4 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 553 litres | 784 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Lexus RX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`500 kg | 3`000 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`995 kg | 2`115 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 505 kg | 885 kg | |
| Lexus RX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 75 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |