Lexus RX 2016 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Lexus RX engine produces 11 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 250 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.9 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus RX could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus IS, Lexus GS, Lexus NX | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Lexus RX is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 553 litres | 780 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Lexus RX has 227 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This could mean that the Lexus RX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 200 | 63 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |