Lexus RX 2016 vs BMW X5 2013

 
Lexus RX
2016 - 2019
BMW X5
2013 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol4.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 238 HP450 HP
Torque: 350 NM650 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds5 seconds
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving.
Lexus RX engine produces 212 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 300 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.810.4
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Lexus RX consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that by driving the Lexus RX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 72 litres85 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 920 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
1090 km on highway1020 km on highway
Lexus RX gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 200 mm (7.9 inches)209 mm (8.2 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years16 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus IS, Lexus GS, Lexus NXInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6, BMW 6 sērija
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.89 m4.87 m
Width: 1.90 m1.94 m
Height: 1.71 m1.76 m
Lexus RX is 2 cm longer than the BMW X5, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 553 litres650 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1870 litres
BMW X5 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Lexus RX has 97 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the Lexus RX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: no data12.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`5002`885
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 33 20029 200
Pros and Cons: Lexus RX has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
BMW X5 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv