Lexus RX 1997 vs Honda CR-V 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lexus RX is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Honda CR-V has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Lexus RX is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Lexus RX also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Honda CR-V is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 - 223 HP | 140 - 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 - 301 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 9.2 seconds | 10.6 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 - 13.0 | 6.7 - 10.1 | |
|
Lexus RX petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.71 m | |
| Lexus RX is 3 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm wider, while the height of Lexus RX is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 860 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2130 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Lexus RX has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Lexus RX has 333 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 1178 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 1.6 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Lexus RX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`258 | ~ 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |