Lexus RX 1997 vs Lexus RX 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 (petrol) | 3.0 - 3.5 (petrol, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 - 223 HP | 204 - 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 - 301 NM | 242 - 342 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 9.2 seconds | 7.6 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 - 13.0 | 8.1 - 12.2 | |
|
Lexus RX 1997 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Lexus RX 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Lexus RX 1997 is smaller. Lexus RX 1997 is 16 cm shorter than the Lexus RX 2003, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX 1997 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 860 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2130 litres | 2130 litres | |
|
Lexus RX 1997 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Lexus RX 1997 has 370 litres more trunk space than the Lexus RX 2003. The Lexus RX 2003 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`258 | ~ 2`422 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Lexus RX has
| |