Lexus RX 2003 vs Volvo XC90 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Lexus RX is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC90 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 3.0 - 3.5 | 2.4 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 204 - 272 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
Torque: | 242 - 342 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 9 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 12.2 | 8.2 - 13.5 | |
Lexus RX petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.74 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.77 m | |
Lexus RX is smaller. Lexus RX is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 249 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2130 litres | 1837 litres | |
Lexus RX has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Lexus RX has 241 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 293 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 12.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`422 | ~ 2`735 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 6400 | 8400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 8.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |