Lexus RX 2012 vs Volvo XC90 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 | 2.4 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 188 - 299 HP | 163 - 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 - 346 NM | 320 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 11 seconds | 9.5 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 10.6 | 8.1 - 11.5 | |
|
Lexus RX petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Lexus RX is smaller. Lexus RX is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 496 litres | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1570 litres | 1837 litres | |
|
Volvo XC90 has more luggage space. Lexus RX has 104 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 267 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Lexus RX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`523 | ~ 2`718 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |