Lexus RX 2012 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lexus RX is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC60 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 188 - 299 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 - 346 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 11 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
| In general, Lexus RX are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volvo XC60. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 10.6 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Lexus RX petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Lexus RX is 13 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 496 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1570 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`523 kg | ~ 2`401 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`908 kg | ~ 1`827 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 615 kg | ~ 574 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |