Lexus RX 2016 vs Lexus RX 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.5 | 3.0 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 - 313 HP | 204 - 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 335 - 363 NM | 242 - 342 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 - 9.5 seconds | 7.6 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 10.7 | 8.1 - 12.2 | |
|
Lexus RX 2016 petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Lexus RX 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Lexus RX 2016 is larger. Lexus RX 2016 is 16 cm longer than the Lexus RX 2003, 6 cm wider, while the height of Lexus RX 2016 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 553 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2130 litres | |
|
Lexus RX 2016 has more luggage capacity. Lexus RX 2016 has 63 litres more trunk space than the Lexus RX 2003. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX 2016 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Lexus RX 2003. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`591 | ~ 2`422 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Lexus RX has
| |