Lexus RC 2014 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 6.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 311 HP | 453 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 617 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.6 seconds | |
| Lexus RC engine produces 142 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 237 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 12.8 | |
|
The Lexus RC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RC consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Lexus RC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Lexus RC is smaller. Lexus RC is 9 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 294 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RC is 1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Lexus RC can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`245 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RC has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |