Lexus RC 2014 vs Kia Cerato 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Lexus RC is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Kia Cerato has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Lexus RC is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Cerato can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 245 - 477 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 320 - 530 NM | 194 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 7.5 seconds | 8.5 - 9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 12.3 | 6.9 - 7.2 | |
Lexus RC petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Cerato. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
Lexus RC is larger, but slightly lower. Lexus RC is 19 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, 7 cm wider, while the height of Lexus RC is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | 433 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Lexus RC has 10 litres less trunk space than the Kia Cerato. This could mean that the Lexus RC uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`216 | ~ 1`254 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 23 000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RC has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |