Lexus RC 2014 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lexus RC is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Camaro has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Lexus RC is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Camaro can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 2.0 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 - 477 HP | 238 - 453 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 - 530 NM | 400 - 617 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 7.5 seconds | 4.6 - 5.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 12.3 | 8.0 - 12.8 | |
|
On average, the Lexus RC petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Lexus RC is smaller, but slightly higher. Lexus RC is 9 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RC is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 423 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RC is 0.8 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Lexus RC can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`216 | ~ 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RC has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |