Lexus NX 2014 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Lexus NX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus NX engine produces 91 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 155 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Lexus NX reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 7.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus NX consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus NX could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus IS, Lexus RX, Lexus GS | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Lexus NX engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Lexus NX is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 5 cm wider, while the height of Lexus NX is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 501 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Lexus NX has 90 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus NX is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Lexus NX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`359 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mitsubishi Outlander scores higher in safety tests. The Mitsubishi Outlander scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus NX has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |