Lexus NX 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
| Lexus NX engine produces 11 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Despite less power, Lexus NX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.9 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus NX consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus NX could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus IS, Lexus RX, Lexus GS | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Lexus NX is 27 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 501 litres | 591 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Lexus NX has 90 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Lexus NX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus NX is 0.5 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Lexus NX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`309 | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Lexus NX scores higher in safety tests. The Lexus NX scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 000 | 32 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus NX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |