Lexus NX 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Lexus NX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus NX engine produces 2 HP less power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 30 NM more than Volvo XC60. Despite less power, Lexus NX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.5 | |
|
The Lexus NX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus NX consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Lexus NX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Lexus NX is smaller. Lexus NX is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus NX is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 555 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1600 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Lexus NX has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus NX (by 145 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus NX is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Lexus NX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`295 kg | 2`270 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`630 kg | 1`935 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 665 kg | 335 kg | |
| Lexus NX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 50 procentiem more than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Lexus NX is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus NX has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |