Lexus NX 2014 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 155 HP | 240 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Lexus NX engine produces 85 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Lexus NX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 8.5 | |
The Lexus NX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus NX consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Lexus NX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
Lexus NX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.71 m | |
Lexus NX is smaller. Lexus NX is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus NX is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1520 litres | 1455 litres | |
Lexus NX has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus NX (by 65 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Lexus NX is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Lexus NX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`245 | 2`270 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 26 200 | 15 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Lexus NX has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |