Lexus NX 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Lexus NX engine produces 94 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 155 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Lexus NX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 7.9 | |
| Lexus NX consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Lexus NX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus NX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Lexus NX is 26 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 591 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Lexus NX has 116 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Lexus NX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus NX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`395 | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Lexus NX scores higher in safety tests. The Lexus NX scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 000 | 32 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus NX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |