Lexus LX 1998 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 234 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 434 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Lexus LX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus LX engine produces 71 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 91 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Lexus LX reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.0 | 10.4 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus LX consumes 5.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus LX could require 840 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Lexus LX is larger, but lower. Lexus LX is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 6 cm wider, while the height of Lexus LX is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2510 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LX is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Lexus LX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`112 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LX has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |