Lexus LX 1998 vs Lexus RX 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 234 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 434 NM | 283 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Lexus LX engine produces 30 HP more power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 151 NM more than Lexus RX. Despite the higher power, Lexus LX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.0 | 12.2 | |
|
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus LX consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus LX could require 570 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Lexus LX is larger. Lexus LX is 15 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 10 cm wider, while the height of Lexus LX is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2510 litres | 2130 litres | |
|
Lexus LX has more luggage capacity. Lexus LX has 102 litres more trunk space than the Lexus RX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus LX (by 380 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LX is 0.7 metres more than that of the Lexus RX, which means Lexus LX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`112 | 2`380 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LX has
|
Lexus RX has
| |