Lexus LX 1998 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2002

 
Lexus LX
1998 - 2007
Land Rover Range Rover
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.7 Petrol4.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 234 HP282 HP
Torque: 434 NM440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds9.2 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving.
Lexus LX engine produces 48 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Lexus LX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 16.016.2
Lexus LX consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Lexus LX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 96 litres100 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
690 km on highway790 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 700'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus LX engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 14 years9 years
Engine spread: Used also on Lexus GXInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.89 m4.95 m
Width: 1.94 m1.96 m
Height: 1.85 m1.82 m
Both cars are similar in size. Lexus LX is 6 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus LX is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 541 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2510 litresno data
Turning diameter: 12.1 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Lexus LX is 0.5 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Lexus LX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 3`1123`500
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 13 2005800
Pros and Cons: Lexus LX has
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Land Rover Range Rover has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv