Lexus LX 2007 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005

 
Lexus LX
2007 - 2012
Land Rover Range Rover
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 5.7 Petrol4.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 367 HP396 HP
Torque: 530 NM560 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.5 seconds7.5 seconds
Lexus LX engine produces 29 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 14.516.0
The Lexus LX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Lexus LX consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Lexus LX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 93 litres100 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 840'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus LX engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 19 years4 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carUsed also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Lexus LX engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.99 m4.95 m
Width: 1.97 m1.96 m
Height: 1.92 m1.82 m
Lexus LX is larger.
Lexus LX is 4 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 1 cm wider, while the height of Lexus LX is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres535 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2560 litresno data
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Lexus LX has 105 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. This could mean that the Lexus LX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 12.8 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Lexus LX is 1.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Lexus LX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 3`3003`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 27 6006600
Pros and Cons: Lexus LX has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv