Lexus LX 2012 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 367 HP | 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 530 NM | 625 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Lexus LX engine produces 143 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Lexus LX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.8 | 14.9 | |
| Lexus LX consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Lexus LX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 840'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus LX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Jaguar XJ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Lexus LX engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 701 litres | 535 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1276 litres | no data | |
|
Lexus LX has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Lexus LX has 166 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. The Land Rover Range Rover may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LX is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 65 000 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |