Lexus LX 2012 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 4.4 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Lexus LX) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 367 HP | 339 HP | |
| Torque: | 530 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Lexus LX engine produces 28 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, but torque is 170 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Despite the higher power, Lexus LX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.8 | 8.7 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus LX consumes 6.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus LX could require 915 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 840'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus LX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.84 m | |
| Lexus LX and Land Rover Range Rover are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 701 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1276 litres | 2030 litres | |
| Lexus LX has 151 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 754 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LX is 0.1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 61 200 | 42 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |