Lexus LX 2015 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.5 Diesel | 4.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 339 HP | |
| Torque: | 650 NM | 740 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Lexus LX engine produces 67 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Lexus LX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus LX consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus LX could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 225 mm (8.9 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Land Cruiser | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus LX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.87 m | |
| Lexus LX is 7 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus LX is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 701 litres | 639 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1267 litres | 1943 litres | |
| Lexus LX has 62 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 676 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LX is 0.1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`350 kg | 3`290 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`510 kg | 2`504 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 840 kg | 786 kg | |
| Lexus LX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 6 procentiem more than Land Rover Range Rover. Therefore, Lexus LX is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 102 000 | 95 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |