Lexus LX 2012 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lexus LX is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi ASX has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Lexus LX is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi ASX can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi ASX also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 5.7 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi ASX is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 367 - 383 HP | 114 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 530 - 546 NM | 154 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 10.2 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 - 14.8 | 4.6 - 8.1 | |
|
Lexus LX petrol engines consumes on average 7.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 225 mm (8.9 inches) | 170 - 195 mm (6.7 - 7.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Lexus LX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Lexus LX is larger. Lexus LX is 71 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 20 cm wider, while the height of Lexus LX is 30 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 701 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2353 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Lexus LX has more luggage capacity. Lexus LX has 259 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus LX (by 1134 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LX is 2.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Lexus LX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`300 | ~ 2`005 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 64 600 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LX has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |